Elijah Cham vs Kasidit Samrej Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 25 Jun at 04:52 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
E. Cham vs K. Samrej

AUS
1
Win
Played
0
Win

THA
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Cham 1 - 0 Samrej
They have played 3 sets in total, with Elijah Cham winning 2 and Kasidit Samrej winning 1. The last match between Elijah Cham and Kasidit Samrej was at the M15 Maanshan, 25-06-2025, Round: R1, Surface: I.hard, with Elijah Cham getting the victory 2-6 7-5 6-4.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Cham | 1 |
| Samrej | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(R1) M15 Maanshan(06-25-25)
E. Cham vs K. Samrej H2H Profile
E. Cham vs K. Samrej Match Preview:
- Recent form shows Samrej winning 44.76% of points on their second serve, compared to Cham's 0%. A significant advantage for Samrej in predicting match outcomes.
- Return game analysis indicates Samrej is winning 44.52% of their opponents' second serve points, while Cham is at 0%, suggesting stronger return performance by Samrej.
- When returning first serves, Samrej captures 23.7% of points, whereas Cham again scores 0%, giving Samrej an upper hand in this context.
- Under pressure, Samrej saves 59.72% of break points, contrasting starkly with Cham's 0%, hinting at better mental resilience from Samrej.
- Looking at the past year's match winning rate, Samrej has a slightly lower win percentage at 62.69% compared to Cham's 64.71%. Is overall consistency in matches the key?
- Examining surface preference, Samrej performs best on hard courts with a 54% win rate, whereas Cham's best surface win rate of 71% comes on indoor hard courts. Which playing surface will suit them better?
- In tournament level, Samrej shows a balanced 50% win rate in Challengers/ITF > $10K, while Cham has a stronger 64.71% win rate in Futures/Satellites/ITF $10K events.
- Samrej has faced opponents with an average rank of 359.12, higher than Cham's average of 275.82, implying Cham may face stiffer competition.
- In deciding sets over the last year, Samrej has a 41% success rate, slightly lower than Cham's 50%. Will this affect close match situations?
- For breakpoint conversion in recent form, Samrej at 27.83% significantly outperforms Cham at 0%, indicating potential edge during key game points.
Editorial Prediction (June 25, 2025, UTC):
The upcoming match between Samrej and Cham presents a fascinating comparison of recent performance trends and historical statistics. Samrej’s strong second serve and return game, along with a notable breakpoint conversion rate, suggest they have clear technical advantages.
Despite Cham having slightly better recent match-winning consistency, their struggles in serving and return under pressure could prove detrimental, especially against Samrej's resilience in breakpoint situations.
Given Samrej’s superior performance in pivotal game moments and Cham's below-par record in similar scenarios, Samrej appears to be the likely winner of this intriguing tennis matchup. Their ability to thrive under pressure and capture key points may well tip the scales in their favor.
Elijah Cham vs Kasidit Samrej Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
E. Cham vs K. Samrej H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 1 |
| 15 | Games Won | 15 |
| 5 | Aces (Total) | 6 |
| 6 | Total Double Faults | 3 |
| 2:30:0 | Average Match Time | 2:30:0 |
| 60% (62/103) | 1st Serve % | 58% (49/84) |
| 66% (41/62) | 1st Serve Win % | 67% (33/49) |
| 44% (18/41) | 2nd Serve Win % | 51% (18/35) |
| 45% (5/11) | Break Pts Won % | 36% (5/14) |
| 39% (33/84) | Return Points Win % | 43% (44/103) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | Deciding Set Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
Recent Performance Stats
E. Cham Recent Matches Played
K. Samrej Recent Matches Played

E. Cham vs K. Samrej Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 60.00% (15/10) | YTD Win/Loss | 56.55% (151/116) |
| 60.00% (36/24) | Sets Win/Loss | 57.26% (343/256) |
| 53.71% (326/281) | Games Win/Loss | 52.56% (2990/2699) |
| 56.25% (9/7) | Hard Win/Loss | 54.43% (129/108) |
| 0% (0/0) | Clay Win/Loss | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 66.67% (6/3) | Indoor Hard W/L | 75.86% (22/7) |
| 0.07 | Aces Per Game | 0.56 |
| 20 | Aces Total | 1542 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.32 |
| 36 | Total Double Faults | 882 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1:34:56 |
| 264.12 | Average Opponent Rank | 467.86 |
| 61% (537/887) | 1st Serve % | 61% (10031/16383) |
| 63% (336/537) | 1st Serve Win % | 72% (7248/10031) |
| 48% (169/350) | 2nd Serve Win % | 50% (3166/6352) |
| 50% (43/86) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 41% (625/1522) |
| 44% (358/816) | Return Points Win % | 39% (6167/15970) |
| 0% (0/0) | Slam W/L | 0.00% (0/1) |
| 0% (0/0) | Cups W/L | 25.00% (2/6) |
| 0% (0/0) | Challenger W/L | 45.59% (31/37) |
| 60.00% (15/10) | Futures W/L | 62.11% (118/72) |
| 60% (15/25) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 58% (145/251) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 40% (2/5) |
| 67% (4/6) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 53% (41/77) |
| 40% (4/10) | Deciding Set Win % | 41% (29/71) |
| 87% (15/13) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (155/131) |
| 13% (15/2) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (155/24) |
| 20% (10/2) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 18% (111/20) |